Showing posts with label predictions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label predictions. Show all posts

Limitless Qualifier #1 Metagame Preview

✎ Tate Whitesell (@twhitesell42) 

This Saturday, April 18th, 2020, over 1000 players from around the world will participate in one of the largest Pokémon Trading Card Game tournaments in history, and certainly the largest-ever PTCGO tournament. All of the information about Limitless's Online Series, including this weekend's Qualifier #1, can be found at their website here. In this article I simply aim to give a brief breakdown of my expected metagame for this Qualifier, based on some data I've analyzed from a variety of small online tournaments held during this COVID-19 pandemic.

I repurposed the old "Weekly League Cup Data" table, which has been out of commission for several weeks now with the remainder of season being canceled, for displaying the data from these online tournaments. These tournaments were League Cup-sized PTCGO events hosted by TOs, game stores, or prominent players or community figures, and should serve as an effective "League Cup Sample" to analyze the current UPR-SSH metagame.

Click to view the full rankings

The results seem to back up what I've been telling my teammates and friends who are playing in this Qualifier, as well as the opinions I've shared in Limitless's Discord server: I think the "decks to beat" for this event are Blacephalon UNB, Arceus & Dialga & Palkia-GX/Zacian V ("ADPZ"), and Cinccino Mill.

Blacephalon has been cleaning up in online tournaments over the past month, with lists based on Stéphane Ivanoff's most recent iteration proving most successful. Blacephalon had a very high conversion rate from Top 8 into Top 4 and finals; it won 5 of the 9 tournaments in this sample. ADPZ was more frequently found as a runner-up or Top 4 deck, often losing to Blacephalon in those matches. (ADPZ did win the largest tournament in this sample, however: the 58-player Sunday Open on April 5th.) Cinccino Mill was a deck with a high number of Top 8 placements in this sample that ultimately failed to crack Top 4 or finals in most of the tournaments-- I think this is because the deck is very good at punishing misplays from bad players, but a lot less good at beating good players who know how to play against it.

There were other decks that saw some degree of success in the sample, though, so don't be discouraged if you are playing something other than Blacephalon, ADPZ, or Mill this weekend. There are a lot of matchup-oriented or comfort-pick decks in this format that I could see doing very well in this Qualifier. I'll now briefly go over each of the decks from the sample (again, click the link above to see the full rankings), with some notes on why you should or shouldn't play them in this tournament. This is aimed mainly at newer players for whom this event may be one of their first-ever large tournaments.

Blacephalon
Why you should play it: You want a deck with proven success in this format that goes toe-to-toe with basically every Tag Team deck, but are okay with a very sketchy Malamar matchup.
Techs you should run: Definitely add the Victini ♢ that my teammate Le Bui used in the list he used to win one of the events in this sample. In combination with Cramorant V, Victini ♢ elevates the mill matchup from near-autoloss to something you at least have a gameplan for.
Why you shouldn't play it: You aren't comfortable with your resource management skills and want a deck with fewer one-ofs and combo-based cards that will punish you less for suboptimal plays; or you want more favorable Mill and Malamar matchups.

ADPZ
Why you should play it: You want a very consistent deck that will reward good sequencing and resource management and whose gameplan doesn't vary much between matchups, but are okay with the slightly unfavorable Blacephalon matchup and unfavorable Malamar matchup.
Techs you should run: Oranguru UPR and two Energy Switch. This has been my go-to strategy for beating Cinccino Mill and has been very effective in that regard, but the Energy Switches have been sneakily very good in a variety of scenarios and give the deck even more explosive potential. A list with no Acro Bikes to make room for this combo of techs would be my play for this tournament if I was competing.
Why you shouldn't play it: You want a stronger Blacephalon matchup (I think it's about 45-55, but very favorable against inexperienced Blacephalon players), you don't want to lose to Malamar, or you haven't practiced enough with techs and strategies for the Mill matchup (even with the techs I mentioned, you still need to play near-perfectly).

Cinccino Mill
Why you should play it: You're very comfortable with the deck and know the ins and outs of its matchups, and want a deck that will make you work hard for your wins but will reward smart play.
Techs you should run: My teammate Luke Morsa is advocating for Mill to run Wobbuffet this weekend, as a tech for the Victini V I mentioned previously. I also think Mill should be running high counts of Team Yell Grunt currently to make the ADPZ matchup very favorable.
Why you shouldn't play it: You aren't experienced with the deck, as it is deceptively difficult to play optimally (although it can certainly win games when played suboptimally), especially when it draws poorly.

Malamar
Why you should play it: You want a deck that is (surprisingly) very hard to play optimally but will reward good play by having an extremely strong matchup spread.
Techs you should run: Your choice--if you have been testing Malamar, you will know what techs have been most useful in your games, or will have analyzed top players' lists to see what they've been running.
Why you shouldn't play it: Malamar has a reputation as a good "beginner deck" since much of it can be built from starter decks, but it is actually one of the hardest decks to sequence and gameplan with in this format. Don't expect to do well with it if you haven't put time into grinding matchups with it and are willing to think hard about where you're placing your damage counters each game.

Rillaboom/Rowlet & Alolan Exeggutor-GX
Why you should play it: You want an easy-to-pilot deck that beats Mill, although it suffers in terms of overall matchup spread.
Techs you should run: Celebi & Venusaur-GX is pretty hilarious against Mill.
Why you shouldn't run it: You don't want to take 45-55 or worse matchups against the other Tag Team decks, don't want a horrendous Blacephalon matchup, or want a deck that will give you more room to outskill opponents.

Pikachu & Zekrom-GX
Why you should play it: You want a deck that will give you a lot of close games but makes up for its lack of strongly favorable matchups with a good overall matchup spread, including a decent chance against Mill.
Techs you should run: I'm on the fence about Phione for this weekend, as Doll Stall should be a nonfactor, but after seeing Phione put in some work in other matchups in the Faded Town Invitational, I could get behind throwing one in.
Why you shouldn't play it: You don't think the matchup spread is worth the chance of losing a few close games just because you have very few matchups better than 50-50.

Mewtwo & Mew-GX variants
Why you should play it: You want a toolbox-style deck with a lot of room to outplay your opponent and a chance to win most matchups.
Techs you should run: This obviously depends on whether you are running the Malamar, Welder, or Solgaleo-GX version of the deck. Take a look at recent lists from top players to get a good idea of what the best lists are like right now.
Why you should play it: Mewtwo & Mew-GX/Welder has proven time and again that it can compete with any format it's been legal in, but its Blacephalon and Malamar matchups are sketchy and it can be tough to play optimally. Mewtwo & Mew-GX/Malamar can be very disruptive but feels like it can get behind easily in games and doesn't have many matchups it wins very hard. "Ultimate" Mewtwo & Mew-GX (Henry Brand's list) also has a lot of 50-50 or worse matchups and is fairly difficult to play.

Fire Toolbox
Why you should play it: You are really good at drawing Welder. (Okay, fine, you want a pretty consistent and flexible deck with a solid matchup spread, that can be prone to some truly awful hands.)
Techs you should run: Cramorant V and Victini ♢ stocks are high right now. Jesper Eriksen hooked me up with the spicy Centiskorch (with Ditto ♢) tech to beat Mill, but that likely won't work well against experienced Mill players since they can see your list.
Why you shouldn't play it: You aren't comfortable with sequencing and would prefer to play a deck that doesn't rely quite so hard on perfect sequencing to avoid having very awkward hands and boards.

Roxie Checkmate
Why you should play it: You want a high-skill-level deck that gives you lots of tools to outplay people, but unfortunately can't really beat ADPZ (at least, Danny Altavilla has told me it can't).
Techs you should run: Whimsicott-GX could give you a shot against ADPZ.
Why you shouldn't play it: You haven't put in a ton of practice with it (seriously, do not just pick up this deck and play it for a tournament!).

Lucario & Melmetal-GX/Zacian V
Why you should play it: You want to beat up on Tag Team decks and Malamar but accept losses to Blacephalon and Mill.
Techs you should run: Nico Alabas included a Persian (with Ditto ♢) in his list in the Faded Town Invitational to have a bit of counterplay against Mill and Control.
Why you shouldn't play it: I don't think the deck beats Blacephalon or Mill/Control in any reliable fashion, so if you don't think you can win the tournament without going through a bunch of those decks, probably best to stay away from this one.


There are some other decks that popped up-- Lapras VMAX/Frosmoth, Morpeko V, Mareep Stall, and some weird variants on other meta decks-- but these are decks I think will be played in very small numbers or do not have enough personal experience with to comment on. If you are playing any of those, good luck to you, you will be keeping the tournament interesting! 

Richmond Recap, Portland Predictions: How the Expanded Meta Has Changed in the Last Week

✎ Tate Whitesell (@twhitesell42) / Luke Morsa (@Celios_Network)

Last weekend we saw the first major Expanded event of the 2019-20 season, and the first ever major Expanded event with Unbroken Bonds and Unified Minds as legal sets, in Richmond, Virginia. Just one week later, the same format returns to our attention in Portland, Oregon as the West Coast gets its first taste of Regional action this season.

JW Kriewall took down Richmond with the new Rowlet & Alolan Exeggutor-GX/Vileplume archetype, earning his second Regional win six years after his first. But he wasn't the only one to perform well with the deck. "RowlEgg" (as we'll call it to save space in this article) earned nine of the 39 Day 2 spots in Richmond, making it the most represented deck in Day 2. Two different testing groups actually developed their lists independently: Ian Robb (who made Top 8) and his testing partners played a Sceptile-GX line, while Kriewall's group (including Michael Zele, also in Top 8) did not play the Sceptile-GX but opted to play two Steven (or, exclusively for Kriewall, one Steven and a Shuckle-GX).* In PokéStats chat we've been a bit back-and-forth on whether RowlEgg will perform well again in Portland. Tate believes it might be a bit of a trap situation where players assume other players will tech for RowlEgg or play counter decks, but no one actually does, which clears the field for RowlEgg to do well again. Others of us aren't so sure and believe RowlEgg will see much less play and success in Portland.

For this short article, Luke has prepared a few words on each of the format's major archetypes, and we also got in touch with JW Kriewall himself to get his thoughts on RowlEgg for Portland. At the end of the article, Tate will share a counter-meta list he built after analyzing the Richmond metagame and theorizing decks that could beat the variety of strategies seen there.

* Note that Grant Manley, who made Top 4 in Richmond, has said that although the Sceptile-GX was intended as a Zoroark-GX counter, he actually thinks the two Steven are a better counter for that purpose. 


JW Kriewall on RowlEgg
Was it a one-time thing, or a new Expanded meta staple? 

"Rowlet & Alolan Exeggutor-GX/Vileplume was such a force in Richmond because nobody respected Vileplume or Power Plant. Many of the expected decks going into the tournament had heavy reliance on Items, Basic Pokémon, and Abilities. Thus, crafting a deck to shut down each of those types of cards helped my deck win the tournament. I expect Rowlet & Alolan Exeggutor / Vileplume to perform well again in Portland, but not be nearly as dominant as it was in Richmond. Since it is no longer an unknown quantity, attendees will not only know how to tech their decks to beat it, but will also develop gameplay strategies to maximize their chances of winning. Look for there to be a handful in Day 2 of Portland, but I expect it to succumb to counter decks such as Zoroark-GX Control with Reset Hole Marshadow, and Turbo Dark with Weavile-GX."


Deck profiles
Luke's thoughts on how the major Expanded archetypes performed in Richmond and how we think they'll hold up in Richmond

Zoroark-GX/Garbodor
our pre-Richmond power ranking: #11 of 11
at Richmond: 1 in Day 2
Zoroark-GX/Garbodor is a good mid-range deck that has multiple routes of play depending on the matchup and the player's choice of techs. N plus Garbotoxin is a powerful combination that has the ability to control games that at first seem to swing out of favor.

Night March
our pre-Richmond power ranking: #2 of 11
at Richmond: 2 in Day 2
Even in today's game with all its high-HP attackers, Night March remains strong due to its massive damage output from single-Prize attackers. It can be countered (to varying degrees of effectiveness depending on the Night March player's skill) with one-card techs: Seismitoad-EX or Karen. 

Trevenant BREAK
our pre-Richmond power ranking: #4 of 11
at Richmond: 2 in Day 2
Trevenant is not objectively strong compared to many newer cards, but it is subjectively strong in the right meta. The combination of Item lock and spread damage, plus disruptive cards like Counter Catcher and Faba, can make it quite difficult to play against. 

Buzzwole/Garbodor
our pre-Richmond power ranking: #3 of 11
at Richmond: 4 in Day 2
Evolving from the previous Shrine of Punishment-based build, Buzzwole/Garbodor now runs Power Plant and leans on the Let Loose plus Power Plant strategy of turn 1 disruption. Ability lock makes the Zoroark-GX and Mewtwo & Mew-GX matchups strong, and the deck's reliance on single-Prize attackers means it trades favorably in most matchups.

Archie's Ace in the Hole
our pre-Richmond power ranking: #9 of 11
at Richmond: 0 in Day 2
In my opinion, the only thing still keeping this deck afloat is Espeon & Deoxys-GX. The possibility of a turn 1 Cross Division GX against decks like Zoroark-GX or Sableye/Garbodor is a fearsome threat. Archie's is a high-risk, high-reward deck with strong potential but a very volatile setup and strategy.  

Sableye/Garbodor
our pre-Richmond power ranking: #1 of 11
at Richmond: 0 in Day 2
Reset Stamp, Mars, Chip-Chip Ice Axe, repeat. This deck is potentially even stronger than Pidgeotto is in Standard because Expanded has a larger pool of disruptive Trainers to work with. We were surprised to see none in Day 2 in Richmond, but it would not likely have performed well in Day 2 against all the RowlEgg decks. 

Vespiquen
our pre-Richmond power ranking: not ranked
at Richmond: 2 in Day 2
The two Vespiquen players in Day 2 in Richmond played Bronzong FCO to block damage and damage counters to their Benched Pokémon, helping against Espeon & Deoxys-GX as well as Trevenant BREAK. This deck does have some rough matchups, especially if Archie's adds Articuno back into the deck as we expect it might, but the presence of Flareon in the list is very good for the RowlEgg matchup. 


A case study in metagame prediction and building a counter deck
Tate's thoughts on Lucario-GX/Octillery for Portland

After analyzing the Richmond metagame I thought about what decks could counter the variety of strategies we saw in Day 2 there. I realized that a potential weakness of RowlEgg would be a deck that could trade two-shots (since RowlEgg does not have much OHKO potential) while surviving under Item lock and having an out to Vileplume BUS. To that end, I thought a deck with a heavy count of Acerola (to win two-shot wars without using Items) and non-Item-based search would be strong. Based on the success of Turbo Dark and Zoroark-GX variants, I also thought a Fighting-type deck would be strong. What Fighting-based archetype could survive in a two-shot war and function well under Item lock? It seemed like Lucario-GX, which I was first told about by Zachary Everest, would fit the bill.

Here's the list I would likely use if I was able to teleport to Portland in the next few hours. It's pretty rough, as I made it yesterday and tested about 10 games with it, and I'd probably be testing and refining it in my hotel room late into the morning hours, but the concept of this deck feels very strong to me. The matchup spread against the Richmond Day 2 meta feels great. Octillery is a great card and I think this deck even beats control decks because you only need one Energy to attack with Lucario-GX and they cannot lock your hand when Octillery is in play. Zygarde-EX is mostly in the deck to deal with Trevenant and to give you a non-Psychic-weak attacker. One Beast Ring has felt really strong to close out games with Buzzwole-GX or baby Buzzwole. I noticed that very few lists in Richmond played Field Blower so I think Focus Sash also has tremendous value right now.

Studying metagames and using them to predict future tournaments and craft decklists that counter the expected meta is one of the most fun parts of Pokémon for me, so I wanted to add this section on to the article to discuss it a little bit.

Don't miss our Portland Regionals coverage all weekend long right here on PokéStats. We'll have the same live match data, top-player and metagame updates, and round/day recaps as we did for Richmond, and you won't want to miss it. 

Matchup Analysis and Metagame Predictions for 2019 Knoxville Regionals

✎ Tate Whitesell / @twhitesell42

A bit last-minute, but PokéStats would like to share some analysis of the expected metagame at the 2019 Richmond Regional Championships this weekend, and offer some predictions for the tournament.

Richmond is the first major Expanded event of the 2019-20 season, and the first major Expanded event to feature both Unbroken Bonds and Unified Minds as legal sets. Due to the large number of cards in those sets that have not yet seen play at major Expanded events, it is difficult to predict the Richmond metagame based on past data alone (and Expanded League Cup data is sparse enough that it also does not serve as a satisfactory prediction tool). However, our own Luke Morsa has developed a different method to predict this weekend's top-performing decks:
  1. Aggregate the top-tier decks as suggested by top player predictions, meta forecasts, article sites, and Cup results.
  2. Assign a percentage value to each of those decks' matchups against each other (based on personal testing and the input of top players).
  3. Average the matchup percentages to calculate Unweighted Matchup Scores (UMS).
  4. Weight UMS according to the expected metagame (matches expected to be played more often are given greater priority) to calculate the Weighted Matchup Scores (WMS).

For these scores, Luke selected eleven decks, which we believe will be the most-played decks at Richmond based on general community consensus. The table below shows the WMS of these decks, ranked from highest to lowest. Effectively, these are PokéStats's "deck power rankings" for this event--the decks we predict to see the most play ranked by how likely we believe they are to win the tournament. 

You can view the entire data spreadsheet, containing the UMS and individual matchup win percentages, here.

WMS will be displayed when any of the above decks appear in our Live Match Data Graphics on our liveblog this weekend. 

The Ultimate Memphis Regionals Predictions Post

We are coming up on the largest Regional the Pokemon Trading Card Game has ever seen. If the actual attendance matches the registration, over 1000 Masters-division players will descend on Memphis, Tennesee, and only 32 of them - just over three percent - will advance to the second day of competition.

This Regional is going to be insane, and, realizing that, I've gone all-out with my preparation for it. From November 18th to December 10th, PokéStats collected its largest-ever sample of League Cup data: 56 Cups in total, with several thousand CP awarded in the top cuts of those Cups. I've also partnered with Some1sPC to provide a "weekly tier list" page -- our "Meta Snapshot" -- inspired by a concept from the Hearthstone community. Based on these two related but slightly-different efforts, I've decided that there are two tracks I can follow when predicting the Memphis metagame. These are:

1. What if the Memphis metagame is close to the metagame from our 4-week Cup post-EUIC Cup sample?

2. What if the Memphis metagame proceeds on trendlines from only the last week of our 4-week sample?
     - secondary question: what do these trendlines look like? Linear? Polynomial? Exponential?


To elaborate a little further on these: the first option is to assume that the Memphis metagame will not change much from the metagame of PokéStats's 56-Cup sample. There is merit to this assumption. No new sets or promo cards have been released since the EUIC, and the decks seeing success at Cups have been almost entirely the same decks that did well at the EUIC.

However, the second option involves looking at the sample not as one "block" of results, but as four individual weeks of data. This is best visualized with a line chart, which is what our Some1sPC Meta Snapshot does. With this model, we can examine the trends of each deck and try to extend their trendlines to see where they might end up for Memphis.

The second approach is riskier, but offers a more satisfying reward if I get it right. One of the first things you'll learn in any Statistics class is that you must be extremely careful when extrapolating from a line chart. (Anyone well-versed in Statistics, feel free to skip this next section.) Pokemon is constantly changing as the game's top players craft new strategies and bring unexpected decks to huge tournaments. Let's take a look at a Meta Progession chart from the 2016-17 season as an example. (Sorry it's so small! You might need to zoom in...)

To see what I mean about extrapolation being dangerous, take a look at the beginning of this Rainbow Road chart -- specifically the first four data points. The r-squared value, which can range from 0 to 1 and measures how well a linear model fits a set of points, is 0.9681 for those four events. This suggests that a linear model fits them almost perfectly. Yet if I extrapolated from that model when predicting the metagame of last season's EUIC, I would've predicted Rainbow Road to take 19.87% of the Day 2 metagame. My estimate would've been more than a five-fold increase over the actual Meta Share.


Keeping all this in mind, I've decided to use both methods and come up with two different sets of predictions. First, I'll look at the four-week Cup sample as a whole, and, with the assumption that the Memphis metagame will be similar to that of the entire sample, predict the most-played decks at Memphis. Then, I'll use the Some1sPC Meta Snapshot to predict how well each decks will do based on the trends observed over the sample.

I'm making a slight leap of faith here: I'm equivalating CP Meta Share (as a percentage from the Cup sample) with Placement Meta Share (measuring the number of Day 2 spots a deck will earn in Memphis). For example, ZoroPod took 16.79% of the CP in the Cup sample, so I'm then projecting it to take 16.79 of the Day 2 Placements (not CP) in Memphis. I think in the future I'll actually do some math on this to see whether my assumption is statistically backed, but we'll try it for tonight and see what happens.

Here are the decks I predict to make an appearance in Day 2 of Memphis.

Day 2 projected placements
Zoroark/Golisopod-GX - 5
Brokenvoir - 5
Buzzwole-GX/Lycanroc-GX - 4
Decidueye-GX/Zoroark - 3
Volcanion - 3
Gardevoir-GX/Sylveon-GX - 2
Greninja BREAK - 2
VikaBulu - 2
Drampa-GX/Espeon-GX/Garbodor - 1
Metagross-GX - 1
Silvally-GX/Metal - 1
Zoroark-GX/Lycanroc-GX - 1
other/rogues - 2


Next up, I'll use that Meta Snapshot and look at some trends that we've seen in the past couple weekends of Cups:
If we continue to follow all those lines, here's what we can expect for the performances of these decks relative to the metagame of the last four weekends (including EUIC):

Trending up: Zoroark/Golisopod-GX, Buzzwole-GX/Lycanroc-GX, Volcanion, Greninja BREAK, Zoroark/Lycanroc-GX, Metagross-GX, Decidueye-GX/Zoroark

Trending down: Gardevoir-GX (all variants), VikaBulu

It does look like Zoroark decks of all varieties are taking over Standard. Both Lycanroc-GX and Decidueye-GX are formidable partners for it. This is also reflected in the final part of this article, which is our expert panel's Deck Power Rankings.

PokéStats Deck Power Rankings - Memphis Regionals 2017

Best of luck to everyone competing in Memphis tomorrow, and for everyone watching from home, stay tuned to @PokeStats_TCG and this site for the usual coverage!

"Legends Await": Preparing for BRT-SHL Cups With Pro Predictions

It's no Secret: Gardevoir-GX showed
almost Infinite potential during BRT-BSH,
and its Twilight doesn't appear to be near
Welcome back to PokéStats's weekly(ish) recap of Cup results, stats, and predictions! This past weekend saw two Regionals (Vancouver and Belo Horizonte) but also a slew of Cups with a variety of Standard and Expanded events taking place. In Standard, Gardevoir-GX is still the standard-bearer (pun fully intended), with over 40% of the Vancouver Day 2 metagame and nearly a quarter of the Cup metagame for the fourth straight weekend. The deck is extremely powerful and should remain strong until that new Solgaleo-GX comes along...

In Expanded, the format is a little more open. Garbodor Toolbox is the dominant deck there, but there are decks that can beat it, and rumors abound of a potential Dimension Valley ban that would nerf the deck (we'll know for sure on October 20th with TPCI's quarterly ban list announcement). The "Student Loans" deck (Tapu Koko/Necrozma-GX/Dusknoir") is proving it's more than just a gimmick, with strong results including a win at the Daytona Regionals League Cup.

In this article I'll first analyze the Cup results observed in the past weekend's sample. I'll then share some insights on this weekend's new (kind of) format courtesy of PokéStats's Deck Power Rankings Panel. Finally, I'll link to some articles published by other sites that have discussion of the new Shining Legends cards. (Be warned that most of these articles are behind paywalls.)

October 14-15 Cups (last weekend of BRT-BSH)
As BRT-BSH drew to close with a Top 4 containing 3 Gardevoir-GX (which Pablo Meza took to 1st place) Sunday night in Vancouver, it was clear that not only was Gardevoir the top deck, but there were only a handful of other viable decks. If you exclude Gardy and the two "pet decks" (Alex Koch's Zoroark BREAK/Bisharp and Aaron Tarbell's Golisopod-GX/Zoroark) from Vancouver's Top 32, only 4 other decks managed to crack Day 2: Drampa-GX/Garbodor, Volcanion, Golisopod-GX/Garbodor, and Greninja BREAK.

An interesting situation arises when you compare these results with the sample of Cups from the same weekend. Let's look at the 7 decks that made Day 2 of Vancouver versus the top 7 decks from PokéStats's League Cup sample:
Pretty similar, right? And then there's this guy:
We might never truly understand the mystery of VikaBulu. Clearly, it's not that bad of a deck. It had two Cup wins and several more Top 4s and Top 8s in the sample. Yet it failed to even make Top 32 of a 331-player Regional. Lists for the deck range from a build with 4 Sycamore to a build with 0 Sycamore and 4 Puzzle of Time. (The latter is from "Bulu Jesus" John Roberts II, and you can read his "Bulu Bible" explaining the deck in-depth at The Charizard Lounge here.) 

Last month I tweeted the infographic above detailing the Bulu debate and including some quotes from top players regarding the deck. The most logical explanation for the Bulu phenomenon is that the deck is fundamentally strong and has the ability to win small tournaments like League Cups, but lacks the consistency to succeed at larger tournaments. However, it's highly possible Roberts's list, which emphasizes consistency to an almost ridiculous extent, could change this narrative. Only time will tell. 

Let's move past Bulu for now and discuss the other top decks. Volcanion and Drampa-GX/Garbodor are still very strong, and each managed to win at least one Cup. Golisopod-GX/Garbodor fell in the Cup rankings and didn't perform incredibly in Vancouver, but remains a respectable play. The biggest movers in the Top 10: Greninja BREAK (+4), Espeon-GX/Garbodor (+5), and Solgaleo-GX/Rayquaza (+5). 

The rest of the list doesn't feature anything we haven't seen before, really. Yehoshua Tate brought back Drampa-GX/Zoroark BREAK for a 1st place finish, and a WaterBox list featuring some unorthodox techs like White Kyurem FAC and Wishiwashi GRI took 3rd at another Cup. Ho-Oh-GX/Salazzle-GX dropped massively from 5th (7.17% of the sample meta) to 11th (2.78%). (Alex Hill did give faint praise to VikaBulu by claiming in our Rankings Panel chat that it is, in fact, better than Ho-Oh/Salazzle.)

As always, the Cup Sample deck rankings are under the "Cup Statistics" tab at the top of the site.

Rankings panel predictions
Normally I don't ask the Panel about Cup predictions - they have better things to do - but given that this weekend will showcase a new format, I didn't have any statistical data to make predictions with, so I had nowhere else to turn. The general consensus is that, as Rahul Reddy summed it up, "Nothing changes tbh." Here's Mike Fouchet on the top 10 plays: "1. Gardy 2. Drampa, everything else is irrelevant." Jon Eng amended that list to put Greninja in first place, but concurred with the rest.

Zoroark-GX was the only new card really seeing hype. "There'll be a good Zoroark deck, not sure exactly what it'll look like," said Kevin Baxter. "It may also just get put in anything [that already contains] DCE." 

Here are two full Top 10 lists (for best Cup plays) for this weekend courtesy of two of the Panel members. I'll keep their names secret to avoid associating a player with a deck and possibly spoiling a surprise play. 

1. 

1. Metagross GX/ Solgaleo GX 2. Gardevoir GX 3. Golisopod Garbodor 4. Zoroark GX/ Drampa GX 5. Drampa GX/Garbodor 6. Golisopod GX/ Zoroark GX 7. Decidueye GX/ Latios 8. Greninja Break 9. Umbreon GX/ Hoopa 10. Turbo Darkrai EX


2. 
1. Golisopod-GX/Zoroark-GX 2. Gardevoir-GX 3. Zoroark-GX/Zoroark BREAK/Drampa-GX 4. Volcanion 5. Drampa-GX/Garbodor 6. Golisopod-GX/Garbodor 7. Greninja BREAK 8. Vikavolt/Tapu Bulu-GX 9. Metagross-GX/Solgaleo-GX 10. Decidueye-GX


Interestingly, neither of these players chose to put Gardevoir-GX in first place, opting for counter decks instead. I was pretty surprised to see Volcanion completely absent from the first list, too.

Zoroark-GX is seeing a fair amount of inclusions in these decks, but only two other SHL Pokemon are mentioned: Latios and Hoopa. Umbreon-GX/Hoopa is an interesting concept that seems like it could be annoying. I had to look up what the Latios did: for a DCE, 30 to the Defending Pokemon and 30 to 1 of your opponent's Benched Pokemon. It makes sense to pair that with Decidueye-GX: it's a slightly different Alolan Ninetales-GX that is a Basic worth only one Prize.


LINKS: SHL theory articles
Rising to the Above [SixPrizes] - Xander Pero discusses several "strong cards" included in Shining Legends. He notes that "Zoroark-GX is problematic for Garbodor, but won't eliminate Garbodor completely." A 6P Underground membership is required to read the article.

A Closer Look at the Daytona Regional Finalist Decks and My Top 5 Favorites from Shining Legends [60cards] - Jose Marrero gives his favorite new cards from SHL. A 60cards premium membership is required to read this part of the article.

Get Your Shine On! [60cards] - Caleb Gedemer discusses the "Pretenders, Averages, and Ballers" from the new set, gives a rundown of the new Standard format, and even shares some lists. A 60cards premium membership is required to read past the "Pretenders."

Lull Before London, Part I [PokéBeach] - John Kettler reviews SHL alongside the upcoming Crimson Invasion and says "it's been a very long time since I've seen so many good cards released so close together." I'm not sure where John was during the three-month span that tied together Espeon-GX, Decidueye-GX, Tapu Lele-GX, Drampa-GX, Garbodor, Choice Band, Field Blower, and Rescue Stretcher (just kidding John), but this article is worth a read (if you have a PokéBeach premium membership). 

Canada in the Rearview: How Our Experts' Predictions Held Up at Vancouver Regionals

This year, PokeStats has been creating Deck Power Rankings prior to every major event with the help of some of the game's top-rated players. 13 players helped out with our Vancouver rankings - a smaller group than usual, but expected given that not many of the top players actually attended Vancouver, which was a pretty small Regional. 

I decided to take a look back at those rankings and see just how accurate they were in predicting Vancouver's meta, so without further ado, let's get into it. 

Actual Day 2 Breakdown from Vancouver

Everyone's pretty much got the BRT-BSH format figured out, it seems. Gardevoir-GX is the clear BDIF:
A short ways behind it is Drampa-GX/Garbodor (which a lot of players added Espeon-GX into in Vancouver), and following that are Golisopod-GX/Garbodor and Volcanion. Lower-tier decks that still saw success: Greninja BREAK and miscellaneous Golisopod-GX variants. There was one notable rogue in Top 32 in Vancouver: Alex Koch's Zoroark BREAK/Bisharp STS/Tapu Koko, which attempted to destroy Gardevoir-GX while having a decent matchup against most other decks (seems like it worked pretty well). Anyone interested in Koch's list can find it on Limitless here.

That being a rogue pet deck, our Power Rankings did not predict its 15th place finish, but the Expert Panel did pretty darn well with everything else. Let's compare the actual Day 2 Meta Shares of the 7 decks (yeah, only 7... diverse format) that reached Day 2 versus their rank in the predictions:
Koch's Zoroark/Bisharp and Aaron Tarbell's Golisopod-GX/Bisharp were both pet decks and there was no reason to expect them to appear on the pre-Regional rankings. The rest of that chart is about as accurate as you can be without being 100% correct: just switch a couple decks and you'd have the perfect picture. BRT-BSH is now an obsolete format, as this coming weekend's Cups feature the brand-new Shining Legends set. I doubt many players will remember BRT-BSH fondly, as the lack of diversity, oppressiveness of Gardevoir-GX, and the fact that the Vancouver meta was almost exactly predicted the week before, show that it is a pretty "closed" format.

I'll try to have some insight into BRT-SHL published here on PokeStats in the next few days for those of you competing in Cups this weekend, whether that insight is statistical or more subjective (I might pick the brains of my Power Panel while they're taking a break between this past Regional stretch and London Intercontinentals). We'll see if anything might be poised to tip Gardevoir off its lofty perch, and any other surprises Shining Legends might drum up. In the meantime, keep checking back for updates sitewide: new features such as Meta Progression Charts, and updates to event data from past seasons. Stay tuned, and thanks for reading and supporting PokeStats!

"Into the Wilderness": League Cup sample analysis for September 16-17, 2017; views on VikaBulu; and predictions for this weekend

Our second weekend of our new League Cup sampling and analysis process has been a success. Last weekend we analyzed 22 Cups to create an accurate picture of the metagame at the time; this weekend our sample size climbed to 27 Cups. In this article I'll discuss the top decks of the weekend, some "big movers," and some statistically-supported predictions for next weekend.

First, here's a tier list based on the September 16-17 results (which can be seen in full here):

S Tier
Gardevoir-GX

Tier 1
VikaBulu
Golisopod-GX/Garbodor
Volcanion

Tier 2
Ho-Oh-GX/Salazzle-GX
Drampa-GX/Garbodor
Metagross-GX
Alolan Ninetales-GX

Tier 3 and below
Rainbow Road
Golisopod-GX/Spread
Espeon-GX/Garbodor
Greninja BREAK
Xerneas BREAK
Solgaleo-GX/Rayquaza
DeciTales
other/rogues

Trends this weekend
Gardevoir-GX retains its top spot from the previous weekend, falling only slightly from about 20% of the meta to about 18%.

No contest: Gardy is the BDIF for two
weekends running.
More surprising is the sudden rise of VikaBulu. The deck shot from 7th place (7.61% of the meta) to 2nd (12.14) in just a week, and barely any top cuts in our sample fail to feature at least one Bulu player. Some big names playing the deck into Top 8 or higher include Zak Krekeler, Jac Carter, Tristan Macek, and of course John Roberts II, who is known as perhaps the biggest fan and best player of the deck (he has topped multiple Cups with it and both of his Top 32s at 2016-17 major events were with it; he has also developed an Expanded version with Virizion-EX and Scoop Up Cyclone). Later in this article I'll look at four VikaBulu lists and discuss what works about them and how they are adapted to local or expected metagames. 

Also unchanging from the previous weekend is Golisopod-GX/Garbodor in third place. 

Rounding out the top five we have the two big fire decks, Volcanion and Ho-Oh-GX/Salazzle-GX. Both are on the rise from the last weekend: Volcanion up two spots and Ho-Oh up five. The SixPrizes squad has been working on the Ho-Oh/Salazzle deck and Xander Pero took home a 1st place with it while the entire Schemanske family made Top 8 with it at another Cup. 

Some big droppers this week: Metagross-GX from 2nd to 7th, and Alolan Ninetales-GX from T-4th to 8th. With not just one but two fire decks seeing top-five success, it's unsurprising Metagross hasn't been doing well. Ninetales, for its part, just sometimes lacks consistency and doesn't have a terrific Gardevoir-GX matchup. 

Greninja BREAK took a huge drop from T-4th to 12th and also failed to make Day 2 at Bremen Regionals on the same weekend. 

Moving further down the list we see that Decidueye-GX is still not entirely gone, with a trifecta of Top 4 Cup finishes for DeciTales. 

Solgaleo-GX/Rayquaza has been seeing a bit of hype with Tyler Ninomura taking it to Top 8 and Athavan Balendran making multiple Top 8s over the past two weekends with the deck. 

Some wild and wacky decks that managed to make top cut include Kingdra, M Mewtwo/Turtonator, Salazzle-GX/Lurantis, and Turtonator-GX/spread attackers, among others. 

Lastly, the following decks had at least one top cut the weekend of September 9-10 but failed to repeat the feat in our sample for 16-17: Crabominable, Garbodor/spread attackers, Gardevoir-GX with Alolan Ninetales-GX, Pikachu-EX/Magnezone, Salazzle-GX/spread attackers, and Turbo Darkrai. 

As always, full top cut standings and a handful of decklists for our League Cup results reporting are available under the League Cup Results tab right here on PokeStats. For detailed statistics and rankings, click the Cup Statistics tab. 

Bulu Nation
This past weekend, we saw VikaBulu take two Top 32 spots at Bremen Regionals: 7th place under Patrik Bartosovic and 13th place under Stephane Elias Benabdeslam. Benabdeslam's list is not currently available, but we can take a look at Bartosovic's list and use it to analyze why VikaBulu is seeing so much success:

Patrik Bartosovic - 7th place Bremen
(via Limitless)

What's here:
  • 2 Mew FAC
  • 3rd Field Blower
  • 2nd Heavy Ball
  • 1 Max Potion
  • 1 Nest Ball
  • 2nd Energy Recycler
What's not: 
  • Tapu Koko SM30/31
  • Brock's Grit
  • 5th Lightning Energy
  • Oranguru
Analysis: I've seen Mew in VikaBulu once before (a Top 64 list from Liverpool Regionals) and found it interesting enough to tweet about. It's an excellent way to conserve an attacker and force a 7-Prize game. Bartosovic took that a step further and included two Mew, making the tiny little Psychic Pokemon effectively one of the deck's main attackers. If the opponent can't Guzma around it, it can set them back very quickly and I'm positive that's one of the main reasons Bartosovic took this list into Top 8. 

One bad Bulu.
Max Potion is not particularly common in Bulu lists but makes a lot of sense to me since Bulu typically discards its Energy after attacking; a copy of Max Potion essentially gives you a second Tapu Wilderness GX each game. 

Some consistency options like Nest Ball and a second Heavy Ball appear to take the place of a consistency draw card like Oranguru; a third Field Blower was a good meta call with Garbotoxin being very prominent in Liverpool (all of the Top 4 decks played Garbodor). 

This list has foregone Brock's Grit in favor of a second Energy Recycler, and I expect this to be the standard for VikaBulu going forward. Too often, Brock's Grit cannot be found when needed or, more commonly, would need to be used in tandem with another Supporter (like Sycamore) to have much success. Energy Recycler allows for combinations like Recycler > Strong Charge > Sycamore > attach to power up a Bulu out of nowhere, so Brock's Grit is just inherently a slower and less consistent card. The two Recycler also explains the lack of a 5th Lightning Energy which so many other lists play. 

There is no Tapu Koko-GX or Professor Kukui which would seem to make the Metagross-GX and Gardevoir-GX matchups more difficult, but Mew undoubtedly helps with those.

Four other VikaBulu lists are available via our League Cup Results page; take a look at those and compare them to Bartosovic's list to get a look at other ways to build Bulu, whether you want to play the deck at your next event or be prepared to play against it. 

What to watch
This Phoenix is primed for success
this weekend.
There's no reason to expect Gardevoir-GX to not be the BDIF for a third straight weekend, but it wouldn't be surprising to see it fall slightly as people pick up techs like Jirachi XY67 or Enhanced Hammer. As we saw last weekend, the success of Fire-types is pushing Metagross out of the top tier of decks, so Gardevoir is essentially losing its only hard-counter. 

Speaking of Fire, during the making of this post I saw Kian Amini's Tweet about taking 2nd at a Cup with Ho-Oh/Salazzle. That's yet another big name (in addition to Xander Pero and the Schemanskes) choosing to play this deck, and it should be high on your list of decks to look out for heading into this next round of Cups.

A couple rogues that are projected to see slight increases in play include Kingdra and Solgaleo-GX/Rayquaza.

I was somewhat late publishing this recap and the next weekend is already nearly upon us, so it won't be long before we see what this round of Cups has to offer. You can always visit the League Cup Results and Statistics pages right here on PokeStats to find metagame information and decklists. Stay tuned for further coverage, including Hartford Regionals coming up in just a few days...

VA Regionals predictions!

He's going owl the way?
It's that time again... Virginia (Blue Ridge or Roanoke or whatever you wanna call it) Regionals are tomorrow and I've been sitting here doing some math for the better part of the afternoon trying to figure out what will do well.

I posted recently about my model's failure to predict the downfall of Quad Lapras in Brazil and how I planned some tweaks to my formulas and methods to prevent this kind of stuff from happening again. I have made those changes, but the predictions for Roanoke should still be viewed as a test of the formula, and as such, this post should probably not be the deciding factor in what you play tomorrow, if any VA competitors are reading this. :)

(In the future, I think the Rankings will be accurate enough to help with choosing the best deck to play... just not this weekend.)

So anyway. Here's some boring math, before I jump into the Top 10 Meta Share predictions!

A Note on the Math
After inputting data into my model for Utah Regionals and Brazil Intercontinentals, I noticed something very strange: an outlier that caused the sides of my quadratic to curve upwards. I checked and the outlier turned out to be Dark Dragons, which saw a decrease from 6.39% of the Utah Day 2 meta to 0% of the Brazil Day 2 meta. What the outlier was saying was that Dark Dragons should have been a spectacular play for Brazil - which I obviously questioned, since not a single one made Day 2, and I don't think it would have been so overlooked had it really been a top competitor.

The formula with this outlier omitted jumped from y = 0.0574x^2 - 1.3354x + 8.8976 to y = 0.12x^2 - 2.09x + 10.51, a significant change. Likewise, R-squared (a nerdy stats thing that tells how accurately the model covers the data) changed from 0.2854 to 0.2671, significant given the amount of data in my model. I figured it was best to remove the outlier, much to the collective relief of everyone who didn't play Dark Dragons in Brazil, I assume.

My new predictions honestly haven't changed much from Brazil, and I doubt that's surprising. PRC-SM is a pretty stale format right now and I'm very excited for Guardians Rising to make some serious changes to the metagame.

Virginia Meta Predictions
Here are the Top 10 predicted decks for this weekend, per PokeStats's Power Rankings:
  1. DeciPlume
  2. M Rayquaza/Fire (possibly with Gumshoos-GX)
  3. Turbo Darkrai-EX
  4. DeciPlume Rainbow (Jolteon-EX/Regice)
  5. M Mewtwo
  6. Quad Lapras
  7. Volcanion
  8. Vespiquen/Zoroark
  9. Gyarados
  10. Yveltal-EX/Garbodor
Umbreon-GX/Wobbuffet made a big jump in the Rankings but is still outside the Top 10. Two new additions to the list are Zygarde-EX/Carbink and Yveltal-EX/Zoroark, although neither is predicted to get much more than a single Top 32 placement, if anything. 

We'll see how this goes...

Osaka Regionals: A Look at the Japanese Meta! (Top 16 Decklists!)

Osaka Regionals - technically the Osaka 2017 Champions League - were held in Japan recently in Japan's, um, interesting format, which consists of XY through some future Sun and Moon set (SM1+ or something). Basically, cards like Drampa-GX, Sylveon-GX, Choice Band, and Sudowoodo are legal in Japan right now - but so are things like Seismitoad-EX and Battle Compressor that we only see in Expanded. '

Source: http://www.pokemon-card.com/info/2017/20170224_000634.html

Why am I bringing this up now? As we near the May 3 release of Guardians Rising, I think it'd be interesting to look at the Japanese meta and see how some of the new cards may impact the rest of the world. Obviously the decks in this post aren't that useful for crafting decklists outside of Japan, considering the wacky format, but they will let the rest of us see how cards like Drampa and Sylveon are being used, giving us insight into their competitive potential over a month before they're legal overseas. 

There's also the added benefit of having a little knowledge of those crazy Japanese decks should you run into a player from Japan at an Internationals or even the World Championships. 

So without further ado, here was the Top 16 (Masters Division) from Osaka: 
  1. M Rayquaza/Metal
  2. Yveltal-EX/Garbodor/Tauros-GX/Drampa-GX
  3. Umbreon-GX/Zoroark BREAK/Eeveelutions
  4. M Gardevoir STS/Dimension Valley/Max Potion
  5. Sylveon-GX/Disruption
  6. Espeon-GX/Vespiquen
  7. Yveltal-EX/Tauros-GX/Drampa-GX/Alolan Muk
  8. Drampa-GX/Garbodor
  9. Volcanion
  10. Lunala-GX/Gengar-EX/Wobbuffet
  11. Sylveon-GX/Vileplume/Eeveelutions
  12. Seismitoad-EX/Decidueye-GX
  13. Zoroark BREAK Toolbox
  14. Seismitoad-EX/Decidueye-GX
  15. Sylveon-GX Toolbox/Disruption
  16. Seismitoad-EX/Decidueye

The big takeaways from this Top 16 seem to be:
  •  Toad/Decidueye was hyped and is a strong contender but ultimately failed to make Top 8
  • the Japanese meta favors "Toolbox" decks with a variety of tech cards and strategies
  • Sylveon-GX is a strong meta force
  • Drampa-GX is a worthy tech in many decks but can also work on its own
I'll look at some of these concepts in more detail later. For now, let's dive into those decklists. Because some of them are just ridiculous. I'll take some notes on all the Top 8 lists; for the rest, I'll just present the lists. One man can only do so much work.

FOLLOW THE JUMP:

Final meta share predictions for Anaheim...

According to PokeStats's Power Rankings, we predict the following decks to receive the most CP at Anaheim Regionals tomorrow: 

  1. M Mewtwo/Garbodor
  2. Umbreon-GX/Zoroark BREAK/Hammers
  3. Vespiquen variants (likely Zoroark/Eeveelutions)
  4. Volcanion
  5. Turbo Darkrai-EX
  6. M Rayquaza
  7. Rainbow Road
  8. Gyarados
  9. M Gardevoir STS
  10. WaterBox

The Buzz on BeeBox: A Statistical Look at Decks For Dallas, Plus My Tentative Metagame Prediction

December 17th-18th was a big weekend for the Pokemon TCG - so big that PokeStats has only now finished analysis of the data. Yveltal/Maxie's dominated the Expanded San Jose Regionals (although Greninja had a strong showing); but Vespiquen Toolbox emerged as the top deck at ARG Orlando and the first ever ARG Invitational (also in Orlando). Finally, at Expanded ARG Orlando, Yveltal/Maxie's took another first, but there was creativity across the board (Aerodactyl/Talonflame, anyone?). 

Next up: Dallas Regionals, a Standard event occurring this weekend, December 30-31. Here's my statistical take on what'll go down in the Lone Star State (besides another Cowboys victory). 


Vespiquen Toolbox: The New BDIF?
What better way to ring in the new year than with a brand new Best Deck In Format? OK, Vespiquen isn't really new to the competitive scene, in either format. But the latest version of the deck - a toolbox build that can be customized several ways - offers answers to Yveltal and Greninja, and boasts solid matchups across the board.

PokeStats gives Vespiquen the #1 spot in the Power Rankings by a margin of just 0.23 points over the second-place Yveltal/Garbodor. Factoring into this decision are the deck's phenomenal finish at Orlando's ARG tournaments and its favorable matchups against the previous Top 5 in the Standard Power Rankings.

For those that don't know, here's how BeeBox counters the other top decks in the format:

  • Zebstrika BPT to counter Yveltals, Shaymin-EX, and M Rayquaza
  • Garbodor BPT to counter anything with Abilities (especially Greninja BREAK, although Vespiquen's Grass typing also hits for Weakness in that case)
  • Vaporeon AOR to counter Volcanion
  • Klefki STS to counter Megas
Vespiquen Toolbox has performed increasingly well at recent ARG events. 

Yveltal Trending Down?
We just saw Vespiquen's performance at ARG events so far this year - now, take a look at Yveltal decks' performance over the same period:
Now, don't get too excited, because Yveltal still has that 20.73 Power Rating, barely behind Vespi, as I've said. But it has definitely been taking less of the prize share in the last month or so. I don't think this is so much due to counter decks as to the dangers of the Yveltal mirror match, something Chris Schemanske just pointed out in his SixPrizes article. Schemanske doesn't expect Yveltal to win Dallas - he puts his money on Volcanion; a heavily teched PlumeBox; M Mewtwo; Greninja (Grafton Roll's Yveltal-beating version); or, curiously, M Altaria.

This is like what happened with Night March at 2016 Worlds. Night March was clearly the BDIF, but it was countered out of existence by things like Greninja, Trevenant, and PlumeBox. If I recall, only one Night March deck made Top 8 despite the fact that it was the most-played deck at the whole tournament. Yveltal is destined for this fate at Dallas, I think. It's a great deck, but there's going to be too much Zebstrika, Greninja, and PlumeBox for it to deal with.

Greninja: Consistently Inconsistent or Inconsistently Consistent?
That's a little more confusing on the page than it sounded in my head. What I mean is: Greninja is the most inconsistent deck at the moment, with mulligans, useless Talonflames, slow starts, and other issues. But, to quote Schemanske again, "not many decks can deal with a stream of cheap attacks coming from 170-HP monsters." And the deck is really hard for Yveltal to deal with. So clearly it's still good.

That's the inconsistency part. Here's the consistency part:
Above: the graph of Meta Share % for Greninja at this season's TPCI Standard tournaments. 

Simply put, Greninja always does pretty well. Only Volcanion has had a similar level of consistent success across every TPCI Standard tournament this year. The Frogman's ARG record is a little spottier, but that's to be expected with a smaller attendance and prize pool. Greninja might be the only deck in the format right now that's an undeniably safe play, and that's pretty oxymoronic for a deck that quite often has an abysmal setup.

(That little spike at Dortmund, by the way, comes from a pretty well-known fact that I'd like to explore statistically in a future post: in the words of Rahul Reddy, "Europe loves their Greninja.")

My Meta Predictions For Dallas
I'll list first, explain second. Below are what my math (and intuition) predicts for the top 10 decks, in terms of Meta Share, at Dallas Regionals:
  1. Vespiquen Toolbox
  2. Yveltal-EX/Garbodor
  3. Greninja BREAK 
  4. M Mewtwo
  5. Volcanion
  6. Darkrai-EX/Dragons
  7. PlumeBox
  8. M Gardevoir STS
  9. M Altaria
  10. Houndoom-EX/Raticate/Bunnelby
I've discussed the top 3 decks already; they should be pretty self-explanatory. Here's my rationale for #s 4-10:

M Mewtwo just did well at ARG Orlando and is able to take on Yveltal while maintaining a decent matchup against BeeBox. 

Volcanion suffers from Salamence-EX and people teching Vaporeon into Vespiquen lists. Despite that, it's still extremely fast and consistent and should remain a solid play. 

Darkrai-EX/Dragons possesses a lot of options: heavy attackers (Darkrai-EX, Salamence-EX) and locking cards (Giratina-EX, Garbodor). If Promo Giratina were legal for Dallas (as previously expected), this deck would likely shoot into the top 3, and possibly remove Greninja from the Top 10 entirely. Alas, that's not the case - but Dark Dragons is still a great play for Dallas. I'd play it above anything else except maybe Vespiquen. 

I mentioned PlumeBox above, since Chris Schemanske expects it to do well. Schemanske's new list for the deck (in his 6P article) has 22 Pokemon, 9 of which are 1-ofs. It has a counter for absolutely everything. Item lock is excellent, and if the deck doesn't destroy itself (which can happen - it's clunky), it has so many ways to win. This might be the most underrated play for Dallas. 

Conversely, I don't think M Gardevoir STS is that good, but it's definitely consistent. I think people will be playing it as a counter to M Mewtwo and Vespiquen, but I expect its Meta Share to be largely the result of a high number of placements, not any outstanding successes. 

Yes, I think people are going to play M Altaria. I saw this deck mentioned in pre-season discussions on PokeBeach, but it only just got its first big competitive victory with a 5th place finish at ARG Orlando. I honestly have very little idea how this deck works or whether it's good, but I think people are going to experiment with it and it could be the secret deck that makes it all the way to Top 8. 

Finally, we have mill decks. These decks lose really hard to Greninja and have a solid chance against everything else. Houndoom-EX/Raticate has had a few Top 32 finishes so far this season, and I think the time is nigh for it to take one or two more at Dallas.

A final quick note: while I largely relied on PokeStats's Power Rankings to make these predictions, you may notice the current 4th-ranked deck, Jolteon-EX/Garbodor, is conspicuously absent. This is because while the deck looks good on paper, it hasn't made a single Top 32 at a Regional this season with the exception of Dean Nezam's 9th-place Pidgeot-EX variant at Fort Wayne. Jolteon-EX is apparently best left in PlumeBox lists.  






So there you have it - my thoughts on the metagame for Dallas Regionals. Stay tuned for event coverage this weekend, and my wrap-up with updated Power Rankings and some new math-oriented projects in the weeks to come.